Employee Retention Credit

Rancho Mesa's Account Executive of the Surety Department Andy Roberts is joined by Tina Jani, CPA and Partner at Covell, Jani & Pasch LLP, to discuss the Employee Retention Credit.

This podcast is designed to provide general information as to the subject matter covered. Neither the publisher nor the presenter by and through this presentation is rendering legal, accounting, or other professional services. If professional advice is required, you need to contact your tax advisor, the presenter, or the publisher for their services under a separate engagement contract.

TRANSCRIPT

Andy Roberts: Hello everyone and welcome back to StudioOne, our safety and risk management network. I’m Andy Roberts, Account Executive in the Surety Group with Rancho Mesa and joining me is Tina Jani, who is a CPA and Partner at Covell, Jani & Pasch LLP. Today we are going to be talking about the Employee Retention Credit, which is something many contractors remain unaware of.  Welcome to the show, Tina.

Tina Jani: Thank you very much for having me. I am very excited to be here!

Andy: As I mentioned the Employee Retention Credit is something a lot of contractors haven’t heard of, but what is the ERC?

Tina: The ERC is an economic recovery program created by the CARES Act – the same legislation that created the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP).

Andy: That’s interesting that it was brought about by the same legislation that provided for the PPP but what brought about the need for the ERC?

Tina: The US government introduced the program to help businesses with employees who got affected either by full/partial shutdown rules or if the gross revenue went down by certain percentage in 2020 and 2021.

Your business may qualify for a stimulus check of up to $26,000 per employee by claiming employee retention tax credits.

Andy: You mentioned percentage. Can you elaborate what are those percentages?

Tina: Yes, absolutely! The key percentages to keep in mind are:
a. For 2020 - 50%
b. And for 2021 - 20%

What that means is you take 2019 as a base year. Then you compare your Quarterly Gross revenue for the year 2020 and 2021 with the same quarter in 2019. If your quarterly gross receipt went down by 50% in any quarter in 2020 or 20% in 2021, you are eligible for the Employee Retention credit for that particular quarter.

Please keep in mind that these are just key points. The actual rules are much more detailed and generous.

Andy: This is all great information. So when did the program start and when did it end?

Tina: The program started on March 13, 2020 and it ended for regular business on September 30, 2021. There are special rules for new businesses started after February 15, 2020 or if you are  severely financially distressed employer  that makes you eligible for the ERC for the fourth quarter of 2021 as well.

Andy: Does that mean it’s too late to apply for the ERC?

Tina: No, absolutely not. You can go back and amend your payroll tax return which is form 941. The statue runs for three years from the date the original 941 was due. You can still apply for the ERC by filing form 941X. The first statue will for Q1 2020 will run out on April 30, 2023. Businesses still have from 6 months to one and a half year to go back and amend their payroll tax returns and apply for the ERC. However, we highly recommend that businesses pay attention to this credit as soon as possible.

Andy: Do you have to prove that your business was affected by COVID to be eligible for the ERC?

Tina: No, you don’t have to prove that your business was affected by COVID. As long as you show a drop in the gross revenue and that can be because of any reason, your business is eligible for the ERC.

Andy: Can you give me an example of a client that didn’t know about the ERC until you told them and how they benefited?

Tina: It is interesting that almost every business was familiar with the PPP loans but not very many businesses are familiar with the ERC. When we started working on the ERC, we contacted all our clients including our largest client and asked for their gross revenue analysis. We made them aware of the ERC and they were eligible for two quarters, total $2.8m. This is just one example. There are numerous businesses out there who are eligible for the ERC and has not applied yet.

Andy: That was all great information and this sounds like a credit that can have a big influence on a contractor’s financial statement, which as you know, in the world of Surety Bonds is very important because a contractors financials are the driving force behind what they can qualify for when it comes to a bond program. This was a somewhat basic overview of the ERC and how it works and I know it’s more complicated and requires the help of an expert like yourself, so how would you recommend a company owner start the process of determining if they qualify for the ERC?

Tina: ERC is a very generous program that a small business owner should not ignore. The process is very simple and straightforward, especially under gross revenue drop method. Basically, you start with comparing your gross revenue. They should contact their CPA or tax professional to start the discussion I am happy to answer any questions and can be reached at my email address pjani@cjp-cpas.com or my phone 760-737-0700.

Andy: That’s great to hear. Thank you so much for joining me Tina to discuss this very important topic.

Tina: Thank you for having me.

Choosing the Best Surety Partner for Your Contractor Bonding Program

Author, Matt Gaynor, Director of Surety, Rancho Mesa Insurance Services, Inc.

The Rancho Mesa Bond Department is currently appointed with 25 surety carriers to support our contractor clients with all sizes of bond programs. It is key that the contractor is matched with the correct bond company to ensure timely approval for bonding. For both new and existing clients, we look at several factors to ensure you are partnering with the bond company that will provide the best single and aggregate bond program at the most competitive rate.

During our initial meeting, we will determine the program size required to make your company successful. We discuss the underwriting requirements of several surety markets to determine the best fit. Two questions that assist us in the process are:

1. What financial presentation do you have at your fiscal year end (i.e., audit, review, compilation, internal) and how often do you prepare internal financial statements?

2. What was your largest single project and what do you anticipate needing in the next two years? (Same question is asked for aggregate program.)

Then, we will discuss the bond markets that best fit your needs. Below is a general breakdown of five categories of bond placements:

1. Fortune 1000 and larger regional accounts – we work with seven large carriers with US Treasury approved limits in excess of $500,000,000. The bond company will typically require annual audited financial statement and quarterly internal statements.  

2. Accounts with a strong balance sheet, bank line of credit, audited or reviewed financial statements, and quarterly work in progress schedules – 11 middle market carriers can support these programs where an occasional bond will exceed $50,000,000.

3. Accounts with good balance sheets but also lean on the personal net worth of the owners. The largest segment of 15 carriers support these contractor accounts. 

4. Accounts were the personal net worth of the owners is stronger than the company assets and essential to support bonding. There are 5 players in this area.

5. Credit-based bond programs for contractors that only require an occasional bond under $750,000. These require the least amount of paperwork, but also the highest premium rate. Several national bond companies offer small bonding programs. 

If you would like more information on how your particular company matches up with a particular carrier, please contact me at 619-937-0165 or mgaynor@ranchomesa.com.

Blockchain Technology May Further Digitalize the Surety Industry

Author, Andy Roberts, Account Executive, Rancho Mesa Insurance Services, Inc.

In my previous article and podcast, “Surety Industry Forced to Innovate,” I discussed a few technological advancements within the surety industry and how the ultimate goal would be issuing bonds to obligees digitally. While that is still some ways off, the technology is here and there are companies and organizations already exploring how blockchain technology may be the answer when it comes to fully digitalizing the surety industry.    

Simply put, a blockchain is a shared digital ledger that records transactions between parties and is permanent and verifiable. Applying this method to the surety industry, an electronic record (i.e., bond) would be created and shared with all parties to the bond, and any changes to that bond would be automatically added to the record so that every party who has access to it can see the history of the changes. This type of technology and the fact that it’s an immutable record, would alleviate the need for wet signatures, raised seals, and notary acknowledgements, which would increase the speed at which bonds can be issued, while also cutting some costs that are associated with issuing hard copy bonds. As mentioned, these systems are still being developed, but there are companies and surety organizations that are actively working to make this technology commonplace within the industry.   

The Institutes launched the Institutes RiskStream Collaborative, which has spearheaded the effort to introduce blockchain technology to the surety industry. 

“The power of attorney use case was the logical starting point and we’re excited to advance it forward. We are also excited that it will lead to many more downstream use cases, including Bond Signature and Verification,” said Patrick Schmid, vice president of the RiskStream Collaborative. 

Institutes RiskStream Collaborative started by piloting a program digitalizing the power of attorneys and this is now moving into its second phase. This initiative has garnered support from major surety associations like The International Credit Insurance & Surety Association, the Surety & Fidelity Association of America, the National Association of Surety Bond Producers. 

Rancho Mesa is committed to utilizing technology and strives to always be at the forefront when it comes to advancements and changes in order to help our clients stay ahead of the curve. And, while issuing bonds digitally using blockchain technology won’t be happening tomorrow, there are bond companies in Europe along with the Institutes Riskstream Collaborative that are testing the process. And, its participants view this as the future of issuing bonds, which makes it an important topic for us to address and monitor. 

For questions about technology in surety or your surety needs, contact me at aroberts@ranchomesa.com or call my direct line at (619) 937-0166.

Changes Are Coming to California Contractor License Bonds

Author, Matt Gaynor, Director, Surety Department, Rancho Mesa Insurance Services, Inc.

Currently, all contractors licensed in the State of California are required by the Contractors State License Board (CSLB) to have a $15,000 contractor license bond on file with the state. This amount has been in effect since January 1, 2016.

Effective January 1, 2023, State Bill 607 will require the contractor license bond amount to increase from $15,000 to $25,000 (California Business and Professions Code Chapter 367).

If you are a contractor and currently have a $12,500 bond of qualifying individual (BQI) for your company, the BQI bond is also required to increase to $25,000 effective January 1, 2023.

Although we have several months to get this in place, touch base with your bond agent to discuss the timing of the increase relative to the anniversary date of your CSLB bond.

You may be required to pay a prorated additional premium to cover the increase.

The term of your bond may be prorated, which would change the renewal date.

Bonding companies may not offer renewals on their current bonds. If this is the case with your bond company, you will need to put a new bond in place on the effective date of the cancellation.

If you would like more information on how your particular CSLB bond might be affected, please contact me at (619) 937-0165 or mgaynor@ranchomesa.com.

Five Contract Provisions to Consider

Author, Anne Wright, Surety Relationship Executive, Rancho Mesa Insurance Services, Inc.

When the surety provides the performance and/or payment bond required by a contract, that contract is the basis of the surety’s guarantee. Simply put, the bonds follow the contract. Because of this, there are a few key things that the surety is going to want to review, and you should do the same. The goal is to make sure you, as the contractor, have everything in place to ensure your success. 

1. Liquidated Damages

Typically, contracts will have a liquidated damages provision. This is generally the per day penalty imposed in the event you are the cause of a delay for the completion of the project. If you are acting as a subcontractor and can only find vague verbiage in your contract with the general contractor (GC), it probably implies that you are held to the same liquidated damages as the GC is to the owner. Make sure you know the actual value or dollar amount of the liquidated damages and consider your bid amount accordingly. Just because you don’t see a dollar amount per day in the contract doesn’t mean you won’t be held to that flow down provision from the prime contract.

Private jobs may be more flexible. Most all public jobs will have something in the prime contract about liquidated damages and they can get pretty steep. We’ve recently seen invitations for bids that include $40,000/day liquidated damages. How many days delay would it take to eat up your profit on a given job? If you do run up against these higher liquidated damages, consider either conditioning your bid to include verbiage that either caps those liquidated damages to some dollar amount that is reasonable, or include a provision that you will only be responsible for a proportionate share of the liquidated damages based specifically on your work that may have caused any delay.

2. Retention

The standard retention for public works contracts in California is 5% for the prime contractor as a result of the efforts of our subcontractors association. Notably, this standard practice is scheduled to sunset in 2023. There is a bill in Sacramento to make the standard permanent. You can bet groups are lobbying to support the 5% standard as it has proven to be a good number.

Knowing the standard retention is important when negotiating your contract. If you are a subcontractor to a GC on a public works project, review the contract for the retention provision. You may be agreeing to abide by a percentage that is higher than what the GC is having withheld by the prime contract. For example, you may be asked to agree to a 10% retention instead of the standard 5%. That is a business decision you can make, but at least you know the law and consider it in your negotiations.

On private works projects, the owners can set their retention amount. And, we continue to see that being set at 10% for the prime contracts.

3. Indemnity

California law sets a limit to some extent on what one party can be liable for to another party. That said, some contracts may be out of date (i.e., broad form indemnity was the law of the land years ago), or the contract may have been drafted in another state. So, make sure that your indemnity provision clarifies that in no event will your duty to indemnify the other party be greater than what is defined as your scope in your contract and that you are not responsible for work performed by other trades.

4. Insurance Provisions

Insurance requirements are greater in some contracts than others. Limits of liability needed can change from contract to contract. It is best practices is to have your insurance agent review the contract before you sign. Make sure you have the coverages you need and include the cost in your contract amount. We’ve seen umbrella limits increasing with some public and private owners, so account for those increases.

5. Warranty

The standard warranty for workmanship in California is one year after completion. We do see some public owners wanting to extend that to a two-year warranty. In some trades and in some contracts, it might be longer. When presented with a longer term warranty, ask yourself if it is reasonable to expect you will be in a position to respond to a warranty item in X number of years after completion. We strongly suggest that you limit the warranty to no more than two years. In some cases, where bonds are required, the surety may ask for verbiage to be added to the contract to limit the surety’s liability to one or two years, and we will then include that in the bond form, if the provision exceeds the two years.

I have always held the belief that knowing a good construction-oriented attorney is as important as any other professional service provider you have to support your business. Consider that it is probably cheaper to have an attorney review your contract before you sign it, then to be put in a position to have to defend yourself later. A good legal resource can provide valuable input if you come across something new, or not well understood. We have some good resources that we can recommend. Contact me at (619) 486-6570 or awright@ranchomesa.com if you would like to discuss your surety needs or if we can provide other resources to support your business.

Surety Industry Forced to Innovate

Author, Andy Roberts, Account Executive, Surety Group, Rancho Mesa Insurance Services, Inc.

Rarely are the words surety and technology advancement synonymous, and that’s because it’s hard to introduce advancements to an industry where so many obligees still require raised seals and wet signatures on the bonds they are receiving. However, due to some challenges that bond companies, insurance agencies and obligees have faced during the pandemic, the industry is being forced to innovate. E-signatures on bond documents are becoming more commonplace, and electronic powers of attorney and digital seals are being adopted with the eventual goal of creating a surety bond creation process that is wholly digital.  

General Indemnity Agreements executed by a contractor/principal when they are establishing a surety program with a bond company, have traditionally needed to be executed in front of a notary and the original document, with the wet signatures, provided back to the bond company. Now, more and more bond companies are moving away from this archaic practice and allowing these documents to be signed digitally. This is an important change as it shows the industry’s willingness to implement changes that are in the best interest of the principal. Another change that is being brought about is the use of electronic powers of attorney (POAs), and digital seals.

A couple of years ago, very few bond companies utilized electronic POAs, opting instead to mail agents hard copies that needed to be dated using a typewriter. While this method is still being used, more and more sureties are opting to provide their agents with e-POAs that they can print as needed. In addition to this change, digital seals are also starting to be more commonplace. These can be affixed to the POAs and the bonds themselves when they are transmitted digitally. The importance of these two changes is worth noting as they are steps towards creating a process which allows for the creation of a surety bond by solely electronic means. 

Getting to a point where contract bonds are done only electronically is still a way off, but the technologies that are needed are available, making it necessary that the surety industry continues to embrace technology to improve our processes, and to ensure we are providing bonds in the form, whether electronic or paper, that clients and obligees want. 

For questions about technology in surety or your surety needs, contact me at aroberts@ranchomesa.com or call my direct line at (619) 937-0166.

Construction Law and the Future of the Industry With Carlin Law Group

Rancho Mesa's Director of Surety Matt Gaynor interviewed Kevin Carlin of Carlin Law Group on Wednesday, March 23, 2022 to learn about his background, where he started his law career, and current hot topics in the construction industry. Kevin is a well-respected construction attorney here in Southern California who represents a number of Rancho Mesa clients.

One topic of discussion centered on payment disputes.

MG: Are you seeing a lot of payment disputes right now?

KC: No, as your listeners know, the construction economy is on fire right now as there has been a ton of money sloshing around as a result of low interest rates and stimulus. While there are a few payment lawsuits going on right now, contractors seem to be more focused on getting the next job rather than chasing the money they are owed on the last job. Most of my cases right now seem to involve demands for defense and indemnity on large complex public, commercial and hospitality projects. These cases are highlighting how important, and frightening, indemnity language in prime contracts and subcontracts is, and how important it is to have good insurance. Most contracts contain indemnity language where if you are 1% at fault, you agree to pay 100% of the liability. Most people in the construction industry do not know about this or appreciate this risk because it’s never a problem until it’s a problem. These are the risks that make it so important to have the right coverages and policies of insurance, which is where you guys come in.

Listen to the full episode to learn more about Kevin and the Carlin Law Group.

What to Consider When Hiring a Bond Agent

Author, Andy Roberts, Account Executive, Surety Group, Rancho Mesa Insurance Services, Inc.

With the passage of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, there is $125 billion of federal funds available for procurement. This provides a significant amount of federal construction work which will be put out to bid, with a vast majority of it requiring bonding. For contractors that may have never bonded before or bond infrequently, this is a clear opportunity to build revenues. With that in mind, it is critical that these contractors have a good surety bond agent on their side to help them navigate this process. Here are some questions and things to look for when evaluating if an agent is the right fit.

Experience  

It is important to note how many years an agent has been in the industry, but it’s more important to make sure they are a surety specialist. Surety bonding is a very specialized insurance product, and an agent that focuses solely on surety will have a better understanding of what the different bond companies value when they are reviewing a new contractor because each bond company has a different appetite. Additionally, agents that focus solely on surety will have developed stronger relationships with bond companies. This relationship is important because bond companies want to work with agents that are knowledgeable and have good reputations within the industry. 

Agent Appointments

Which bond companies does the agent have an appointment? This is an important question to ask, as bond companies are very conservative and the better bond companies are much more selective with the agents that they appoint. When asking this, it is also important to note how many bond companies the agent is appointed with. Having access to numerous sureties, while maintaining key relationships with the main companies, allows an agent to find the best bond company for each contractor.

Additional Value Adds

Surety bonding is a complicated industry, and if a contractor's goal is to increase their bonding capacity, it is vital that the agent provide additional services, like a detailed review of the company’s financials, and yearly analysis of a contractors single and aggregate bond limits. These services are important because they help the agent and the contactor get on the same page with regards to the current bond program, while also allowing them to game plan for the future, and set goals for how to increase bonding capacity. In addition to these in-house services, an agent should be able to recommend a good construction CPA and reputable banking contacts that know what a contractor needs to maximize their bond credit.

Bond agents play a vital role and partnership for contractors, which makes it very important that a contractor performs proper due diligence when hiring an agent. At Rancho Mesa, we have surety only specialists whose expertise is used to ensure our clients are placed with the right bond company to suit their needs. 

To answer any questions from this article or discuss if we can assist with any bond related needs, contact me at aroberts@ranchomesa.com or call my direct line at (619) 937-0166.

Understanding Single and Aggregate Surety Bond Limits

Author, Matt Gaynor, Director of Surety, Rancho Mesa Insurance Services, Inc.

When we work with the bonding carriers on surety credit programs for our contractor customers, we traditionally put into place single and aggregate bond limits. This provides our contractor clients certain parameters when they are considering a maximum project size for bonding purposes.

The single limit is a guide the contractor can use on a per project basis as they consider various projects to bid or negotiate.

The aggregate limit is the total of all current projects using a “cost to complete” calculation. The cost to complete would be the estimated costs on a project (less) the costs to date. As an example, a contractor may have a $5,000,000 single / $20,000,000 aggregate bonding program.

A few important points to consider:

• The limits are not set in stone. This is important to understand. The bond company will often raise the single and aggregate limit if the right type of project presents itself.

• We include the bonding limits when we prepare a bondability letter for our client. If you are looking at a project that might exceed your single bonding limit, be sure that the required limit listed is sufficient to support the projected amount. For example, if your limit is typically $5,000,000 and the project requires a bondability letter for a $6,000,000 job, it is important that you secure pre-approval from your agent/bond company to increase the amount of the single limit on the letter.

• The bonding limits are often determined by the contractor’s fiscal year-end financial statement. This is one of many factors to set the limit but an extremely important consideration.

One final consideration is that bonding limits listed on a letter are often just a guideline reflecting the normal size of the projects our contractor clients usually bid. Based on their financial ratios and project history, some clients, for example, will qualify for a $10,000,000 limit but only list $2,000,000 because they rarely consider projects over that amount.

If you would like more information on how your particular bond limits are determined, please contact me at 619-937-0165 or mgaynor@ranchomesa.com.

How Year End Financial Statement Preparation Influences Bonding Programs

Author, Andy Roberts, Account Executive, Surety Group, Rancho Mesa Insurance Services, Inc.

As a contractor looking to qualify for a contract surety bond program, your team should be aware that company financial statements will be required by underwriters in most cases. This is largely due to the fact that a company’s financials, their balance sheet and an income statement, represent the primary source of information that a surety will use when building a bond program. And, the way this information is presented goes a long way in determining the amount of credit that a bond company is willing to extend. There are a few different options for presenting year-end financials, with the two most common being internal financials and CPA-reviewed financials.  

Internal statements are prepared either by the contractor in-house, or by a hired bookkeeper, and are often accepted by surety companies for contractors that do not bond frequently and/or only bond smaller projects under one million dollars. The reason for this limitation is internal statements are not viewed as being overly reliable because they have not been prepared by a third party CPA. If a contractor is looking at a bigger job or looking to grow their bond program, then it is worth the investment to have a CPA complete a review for the fiscal year-end financial statement.    

A review from a CPA provides a deeper dive into a contractor’s financial statements and will usually include notes about the financial statements regarding revenue, accounts receivables, accounts payables, and other financial events that occurred over the course of the year. And, while there is a larger cost associated with a review, between $10,000-$15,000, as opposed to providing an internal year end statement, the surety gains a greater understanding of the company’s financials over internal statements. Additionally, they consider a CPA review more reliable and trustworthy, thereby willing to offer increased bonding capacity to qualified contractors.  

Providing CPA-reviewed financials adds additional overhead to a company’s budget, but it can be vital to ensuring the maximum bonding capacity is provided when it’s need it most. Furthermore, to emphasize the point, it is important that contractors select a competent, proactive bonding agent and construction CPA in order to map out a successful strategy for year-end financial preparation. The right partnership can help your firm build the highest possible level of bond credit as you build toward the future. 

Finding an experienced CPA with a construction financials background can be a challenge. I can help recommend someone who can assist your company.

To answer more questions from this article or discuss if it may be time to make the jump to a CPA review, please email me at aroberts@ranchomesa.com or call my direct line at (619) 937-0166.

Surety Keith Clements from Tokio Marine HCC

Author, Alyssa Burley, Media Communications and Client Services Manager, Rancho Mesa Insurance Services, Inc.

Rancho Mesa's Director of Surety Matt Gaynor interviewed Vice President of Tokio Marine HCC Surety, Keith Clements on Wednesday, September 15, 2021 to learn about his background, his role with Tokio Marine HCC and how the company fits into the surety marketplace.

As a college student in Iowa, Keith had career options. Companies visited the college looking to recruit new grads. He jokes that he had a choice to either go into surety bonds, or sell Oscar Meyer wieners. He chose surety.

“I started looking around and thought, you know what? I like numbers… I think this bonding thing might sound pretty good,” Keith tells Matt.

After over 20 years in the industry, “I’m still trying to figure out if I like it,” Keith says jokingly.

Matt and Keith reminisced about processing bonds in the early 1980s and compare the old technology to today’s high-tech methods of getting the bonds issued.

Keith explains the types of surety bonds Tokio Marine HCC writes as an A++ XV rated company.

Listen to the full Ep. 135 to learn more about Keith and the Tokio Marine HCC Surety.

How Improving Equity Impacts Your Bond Program

Author, Andy Roberts, Account Executive, Surety Group, Rancho Mesa Insurance Services, Inc.

In our current series of articles, we are taking a deeper look into the properties of a balance sheet that will affect a contractor’s bonding capacity. We have previously discussed bonding capacity and summarized working capital in regards to the impact it can have on a contractor’s capacity. However, another very important component on the balance sheet that surety underwriters will consider is net worth, also referred to as equity.

Equity is calculated by subtracting a company’s total liabilities from their total assets on the balance sheet, and is a measurement that is used to determine their long term liquidity. From a bonding standpoint, surety underwriters love to see equity increase year after year. They analyze each item in the equity section of the balance sheet such as common stock, additional paid in capital, and shareholders’ loans. One item that carries a particularly large amount of weight is retained earnings.

Retained earnings represents the net income or profit that a company reinvests in its business after distributions are paid to the shareholders. This is important because as a general guideline we say a contractor can qualify for an aggregate bonding capacity that is ten times their company’s equity. Thus, their retained earnings heavily influence the overall equity of the company. Contractors looking to maintain a strong bond program, or increase their bond program, will want to retain as much profit in the company as they can. This allows their retained earnings and their equity to continue to grow through the years, making it even more important to have a knowledgeable and proactive bonding agent on your side. This should be someone who understands your business and overall goals, can analyze your balance sheet, and will discuss strategies with you to reach optimal capacity.

For many contractors, building a strong bonding capacity can create opportunities for significant revenue growth. Perhaps one of the more critical elements to note as you review your balance sheet is being educated on the importance of having strong retained earnings inside your financials. You can start this process and leapfrog your competitors when you request a quick capacity analysis from our surety team. They’ll provide you with a detailed evaluation.

To answer more questions about your bonding program, contact me at aroberts@ranchomesa.com or call my direct line at (619) 937-0166 and we can get started.

Closing Your Bond Liability – Understanding the Consent of Surety Document

Author, Matt Gaynor, Director of Surety, Rancho Mesa Insurance Services, Inc.

The project our contractor client was required to bond has been completed and they are looking to get their final payment and collect their retention. But the owner or general contractor is requiring a Consent of Surety document from our contractor. What is a consent of surety and why is this document required?

The Consent of Surety document is used by the owner to check with the bond company to determine if any claims or notices have been filed with the bond company that the owner may not be aware of. The form states:

The surety hereby approves of the final payment to the contractor, and agrees that final payment to the contractor shall not relieve the surety of any of its obligations to the owner.

Essentially, the bond company agrees that they still have responsibility for the contract even after final payment has been made.

Prior to approval of this document, the bond company will typically request the final contract amount of the bonded project. They may also request that the owner complete a bond status form to determine if any problems/complaints might have occurred on the project.

Once they are satisfied that the project has completed in good standing, they will authorize the bonding agent to issue the Consent of Surety document. They will also invoice for any additional bond premium if the contract increased in size.

For more information on the requirements for a Consent of Surety document and how it pertains to your contract, please contact me at (619) 937-0165 or mgaynor@ranchomesa.com.

A Contractor’s Guide to Bonding Capacity

Author, Andy Roberts, Account Executive, Surety Group, Rancho Mesa Insurance Services, Inc.

For contractors that do a lot of bonded work, their bonding capacity is a critical element of their business. Capacity often determines which projects a company can and cannot pursue, so it is managed very closely. However, for contractors that are new to bonding or have not bonded previously but remain interested in performing bonded work, this is likely a foreign concept to them. So, what is bonding capacity, and what items determine the amount of capacity that a surety carrier is willing to offer?

Generally speaking, a contractor’s bonding capacity is comprised of single and aggregate limits, where the surety underwriter will approve performance and payment bonds for a job, up to the single limit. The aggregate limit is the cap that the surety carrier sets for how much total bond liability a contractor can have extended at one time. Having these caps is what makes it important for contractors to have an understanding of what information sureties use when determining how much capacity to offer. Underwriters will look at personal and business credit, industry experience, as well as personal financial wealth. Typically, though the most important item a surety underwriter will focus on is the company’s financials, specifically, their balance sheet and income statement. 

When reviewing the balance sheet and income statement, two important items that an underwriter will be reviewing are the contractor’s working capital and their equity. We took a deeper dive into working capital in a previous article, but simply put, working capital represents a contractor’s current assets minus current liabilities, and this measures how much a company has available to pay its current debts. Equity, or net worth on the balance sheet, is made up of retained earnings, common stock and additional paid in capital, and these numbers provide a measure of the long term liquidity of a company. Surety carriers take a hard look at this number because they want to ensure that there are sufficient reserves to complete the work that they have issued performance and payment bonds on.    

Building an effective bonding program can take time and requires collaboration with competent, trusted advisors. Determining what type of bonding capacity you can establish and/or deserve is a key part of the process. To find out what your bonding capacity looks like, request a quick capacity analysis and I will provide you with the information you need for your company. To answer more questions, you can email be at aroberts@ranchomesa.com or call my direct line at (619) 937-0166. Stay tuned for my next article which will take a deeper dive into strategies for improving equity and how this can increase capacity.

Bondability Letters – Surety Prequalification for Owners and General Contractors

Author, Matt Gaynor, Director of Surety, Rancho Mesa Insurance Services, Inc.

In the normal process of bidding a construction project, our contractor clients are required to post a 10% bid bond to guarantee that they will execute and deliver a signed contract along with 100% performance and payment bonds, if they are awarded the referenced project. While this is a requirement for public projects, bid bonds have also become more prevalent for certain private projects. By approving the required bid bond, the surety company provides their stamp of approval that they have reviewed the bidding documents and are willing to support the contractor for the specific project.

On certain occasions, the owners and general contractors will require a less formal surety prequalification in the form of a letter of bondability. Although the owner/general contractor requesting the letter does not have the 10% guarantee provided by a bid bond, the letter of bondability can be issued rather quickly to let the owner know that a bond program is in place for the bidding contractor. If this contractor is deemed to be the low and responsible bidder by the general contractor, they know in advance that the contractor has been through a third-party prequalification by the surety company.

This document is normally issued by the bonding agent and contains the following:

• Name of the current surety carrier, A.M. Best Rating, treasury listing, and length of relationship.

• Approved single and aggregate program bonding amounts.

The other key wording contained in a typical bondability letter that differs from a bid bond is as follows:

“The issuance of surety credit is a matter between the principal (contractor) and surety… We assume no liability to you or any other third party if for any reason we do not execute said bonds.”

This wording is important because unlike a bid bond, the surety company does not have an obligation to provide final bonds if their principal is awarded a contract. While this rarely happens, the bond company will need to review additional information (i.e., contractual or financial) before they agree to provide performance and payment bonds in support of a project. For example, the contract or bond form may contain onerous wording that the surety company is not willing to support.

For more information on letters of bondability and how they affect your business, please contact me at 619-937-0165 or mgaynor@ranchomesa.com.

Funds Control May Secure Project Bond

Author, Andy Roberts, Account Executive, Surety, Rancho Mesa Insurance Services, Inc.

As surety brokers, we initiate bond programs for our construction clients. Single and aggregate limits are determined in large part by their financials and experience. Often, there are jobs that exceed the single limit we have in place, or are larger than any job that our client had previously completed. When it is a job that makes sense for the contractor, it is our job to work with the bond company and find a solution so the contractor can bid the job or take on the contract. One available solution is a process referred to as funds control.

Funds control is a service that bond companies use to ensure funds involved in the project will be used for appropriate work-related expenses. This arrangement involves a third party company engaged to handle the disbursement of the funds to the different sub-contractors and suppliers on that specific project. In order for this to be set up, the contractor is required to execute two documents, a Disbursement Agreement and an Irrevocable Direction of Funds. 

The Disbursement Agreement addresses the specific terms agreed upon by the contractor and the third party company and also details the responsibilities of both the contractor and the funds control company. The second document, the Irrevocable Direction of Funds, is a one-page document that requires the project owner, or the general contractor, to send all payments directly to funds control. Once the funds are received, they are placed into a project specific bank account that is set up in the contractor’s name. The payments are then disbursed to the sub-contractors and suppliers based on the pay applications that the contractor submit to funds control. And, while this adds some additional steps and work to the process, there are benefits to funds control and good reasons why the bond company will require it on certain projects. 

For the bond company, with a third party taking control of the distribution of funds, there is a much lower risk of financial mismanagement, and subcontractors, suppliers and vendors can expect to be paid for the work that they do, which leads to a lower risk of payment bond claims being filed against the contractor’s bond. 

While adding funds control to a project adds some additional work and steps to the job, it can be a valuable alternative route and one that contractors should gain familiarity. In many cases, funds control can be the solution that helps get a surety underwriter comfortable with supporting a bond for a particular job that otherwise would not be approved.

For more information or for any questions regarding your surety needs, please contact me at (619) 937-0166 or aroberts@ranchomesa.com.

Get Your Bond Account in Shape for 2021 – A Surety Company Perspective

Author, Matt Gaynor, Director of Surety, Rancho Mesa Insurance Services, Inc.

As we wind down the 2020 year, it is important for our contractor clients and prospects to start planning how the 12/31/2020 fiscal year end financial statement will look. The bond companies will use this information to set your 2021 Bond Credit Line for approval of your projects.

I recently sat down with two industry executives from Argonaut Surety, Steve Parnas, Vice President and Contract Practice Leader, and James Bluzard, Vice President and Chief Underwriting Officer-Contract to discuss the required financial information to ensure our contractors maximize their available bond credit going into 2021. Listen to the entire podcast Episode 56 “How to Get Your Surety Bond Account in Shape for 2021” on your favorite app.

Below are a few excerpts from our recent Podcast:

Rancho Mesa Matt Gaynor: “Although you track our contractor’s financial numbers throughout the year - how important is the 12/31 year-end financial statement?”

Arogonaut James Bluzard: “The 12/31 statement is typically a CPA-prepared statement viewed as the most important statement from the surety underwriter perspective since it is coming from an independent third party. Given the uncertain economic times we are in, and with COVID out there, getting that statement out and into your underwriters hands earlier rather than later will be really important to let the underwriters see how 2020 closed and also to get a forecast regarding 2021, as well.”

Rancho Mesa Matt Gaynor: “Within the CPA document, what are some of the specific items and schedules you are looking to analyze?”

Argonaut Steve Parnas: “We actually start our analysis at the back of the document looking at the work in progress and completed job schedules, which gives us insight into the performance of the past year along with how they are positioned going forward. Also, looking at the receivable and payable schedules to see how they are collecting their money and paying their bills.”  

To get a better understanding of how the bond carriers will analyze your underwriting documents during these uncertain times, please contact me at (619) 937-0165 or mgaynor@ranchomesa.com.

Early Warning Signs of COVID’s Impact on Surety

Author, Andy Roberts, Account Executive, Surety Department, Rancho Mesa Insurance Services, Inc.

The COVID-19 pandemic will have many long and short term effects on the surety industry. While the long term effects might not be known for years, some short term changes are already occurring. Early on, we have witnessed bond companies start to tighten their underwriting guidelines, and now we are seeing an increase in General Contractors (GC) requiring performance and payment bonds from their subcontractors. 

For contractors that do a lot of public works, or work with GCs that require bonds already, this is not an issue, as they have already established bond programs and understand the process. However, for contractors that have never been required to bond before the pandemic, they are thrust into a part of the construction insurance world that is foreign to them. So, what exactly are performance and payment bonds and why are so many contractors now being asked to provide them?

To put it simply, the performance bond is an assurance to a project owner, or in this case a GC, by a surety company, that the contractor is capable and qualified to perform the contract and protects the GC from financial loss if the contractor fails to perform in accordance with the terms and conditions agreed upon. The payment bond assures that the contractor will pay certain subcontractors, workers, and materials suppliers associated with the project. While these assurances are meaningful, GCs very often do not require bonds because of the extra cost associated with obtaining them. Bonds typically cost 1-3% of the contract price with the GC in many cases paying the corresponding premium. COVID-19 has created turmoil in the financial marketplace many ways including a tightening of available money, a lengthening of account receivables, high unemployment, and an overall slowing of the economy. With so much uncertainty surrounding the effects that COVID-19 may have on an individual  contractor’s financials, GCs are becoming more risk adverse and willing to absorb the cost of the bond to avoid subcontractor defaults in the middle of the project. In those situations the GC can then rely on the surety company that wrote the bond who will step in to make sure the work is completed.  

For contractors that have never secured a bond before, the process can seem daunting, complex, and invasive, which makes having a good surety agent and bond company vital to help make the process seamless. At Rancho Mesa, we work with a number of high quality surety markets that provide a variety of different types of bond programs, and we have the expertise to get you set up with one that works best for your company’s surety bond needs.

For more information or for any questions regarding your surety needs, please contact me at (619) 937-0166 or aroberts@ranchomesa.com.

Bond Companies Thoroughly Track Status of Construction Projects

Author, Matt Gaynor, Director of Surety, Rancho Mesa Insurance Services, Inc.

When the bond company approves a performance and payment bond for our contractor clients, they want to keep track of the project until completion - at which time the liability for the bond is no longer on their books. One tool they use to track a construction project is the Work In Progress Report (WIP) which the bonding company analyzes on a quarterly or six-month basis to track the profitability of the project on a percentage of completion basis. When the bond company sees that a project is 100% complete on the WIP or Completed Contract Report, they will mark the bond file as “closed,” once the warranty period has expired.

Additionally, several bond companies will also use a Contract Bond Status Inquiry Form to track the projects. This form is mailed to the obligee (i.e., the owner or general contractor on the bonded project) and requests project information is completed on the form, then returned to the bond company via mail, email, or fax. The questions posed on the form include, “Is the contract completed, and if so, what was the completion date and final contract amount?” In the event the contract is on-going, the form requests a percentage of completion or approximate dollar amount of the work completed to date. The form also asks the owner if they are aware of any unpaid bills for labor or material on the project.

The final area of the status inquiry form provides space for the obligee to fill in remarks. This can be a good or bad thing for the contractor. We have seen responses from owners and general contractors that range from “great subcontractor – excellent to work with” to “I will never hire this contractor again.” Other times, this area is left blank. 

While the primary goal of the status inquiry is to understand if a project is closed or remains open, the remarks section will grab the bond underwriters attention (positive or negative) and that will become part of their underwriting analysis, going forward.

If you would like more information on how the contract bond status inquiry might influence the underwriting of your bond program, feel free to reach out to me at (619) 937-0165 or mgaynor@ranchomesa.com and ask any questions to ensure your bond program is getting the proper attention.

Managing Working Capital is Key as Markets Tighten

Author, Andy Roberts, Account Executive, Surety Department, Rancho Mesa Insurance Services, Inc.

Contractors often ask us what bond companies are looking for when they are reviewing balance sheets and income statements. The answer isn’t a simple one, because there are many items that underwriters look at when determining if they will write a bond for a contractor. Typically, the first thing an underwriter will do is calculate a contractor’s working capital.

Simply put, working capital is calculated by subtracting a contractor’s current liabilities from their current assets on the balance sheet. Current liabilities are any obligations due within one year, while current assets are the most liquid like cash, accounts receivable, and items that can be converted to cash within a fiscal year. This calculation measures what is available for a company to pay its current debts, finance its current operations, and provides an indication of a company’s overall health. 

With bond companies placing an emphasis on working capital and tightening their underwriting guidelines through these uncertain times, it is critical that contractors pay close attention to their balance sheet. Managing their working capital can ensure a contractor receives the bond credit that they need. One specific area a company can focus on to accomplish this is being more diligent with collecting receivables.

Accounts receivable are listed as a current asset. However, bond companies will review the aging of a company’s accounts receivable and likely deduct any that are 90 days or more past due from the amount listed on the balance sheet. These are viewed as not likely to be received and will lower a company’s total current assets, which lowers working capital. This can directly affect the amount of credit that a bond company is willing to offer and possibly lead to bond requests being denied.

With so much remaining uncertainty in the economy, it is more important than ever for contractors to re-visit their balance sheets and take an aggressive stance with collecting receivables. These techniques can quickly build or re-build a strong risk profile to secure the level of surety credit a contractor may need for their bond program. 

As you develop your financial strategy and look to strengthen bonding options, consider Rancho Mesa’s Surety team of advisors. Contact Andy Robert at (619) 937-0166 or email him directly at aroberts@ranchomesa.com.