Essential Steps Non-Profit Leaders Should Take in the Pre-Renewal Process

Author, Sam Brown, Vice President, Human Services Group, Rancho Mesa Insurance Services, Inc.

Non-profit organizations and their leadership often rely heavily on their insurance agent’s experience and insight, gained from working with similar organizations, when considering insurance buying options and risk management throughout the year.

Rancho Mesa strongly recommends holding pre-renewal strategy meetings to discuss, at minimum, the following items.

Claims History by Line of Coverage

Non-profits have diverse insurance coverage often spanning everything from cyber liability to employment practices liability to volunteer accident policies. A thorough review of the last 12 months of claims activity will shed light on future pricing as well as claim trends. This conversation should lead the agent to ask what resources can best support leadership, but also broach the topic of new or infrequently used tools the non-profit should consider employing.

Operational Changes that Affect Risk

We consistently ask clients at the pre-renewal strategy meeting whether any operational or programmatic changes have taken place or will be considered in the next year. Non-profit leaders face a changing landscape pertaining to funding, employee retention, and insurance affordability. While funding for a new program or service is often pursued and shared with the agent, the tougher subject of terminating a longstanding program is becoming more common. Non-profit leaders may assume coverage is no longer needed, which is a great time to educate clients on how to insure future claims for incidents that took place in the past.

Coverage Review: Limits, Exclusions, Gaps

Non-profit leaders are excellent at their jobs, but they should not have to be excellent at insurance. A review of the limits of liability can help policyholders understand how coverage is layered and which layers add the most cost. Affordability is now a very real concern. This subject should also promote a discussion about limits and deductibles required by contract versus an anxious board member wanting the highest limits available. Neither approach is incorrect and both warrant discussion. This is also the best time to remind Non-profit leaders of the insurance they do not currently have in the insurance program.

Risk Management and Underwriting Narrative

Knowing risks, such as affordable housing, foster family agencies, and youth programs, are more difficult to place at affordable levels and helping an underwriter understand all programs and the exposure to risk, is now critical to a positive underwriting outcome. Sharing that a high risk program has been terminated can also help an insurance company accurately assess the risk.

The review of recent claims should allow the insured to share steps taken to prevent similar claims from happening. If the claims record is positive, this helps the underwriter understand the internal steps taken to improve their risk profile. The bottom line is applications do not tell the whole story. A well-developed narrative initiates more control over the process.

Renewal Strategy

The agent and non-profit should discuss whether the relationship with the current insurance company or companies is working well. If the goal is to maintain carrier longevity at a competitive premium, then discuss how to best achieve this result in a timeline that works for all parties. Also important, schedule a time to discuss the marketing process at least 30 days prior to the effective date. Perhaps the target premium is not achievable with the current carrier, but an alternative deductible strategy or competing carrier can hit the mark. It is best for everyone to feel informed and comfortable if circumstances change.

Working with a non-profit specialist agent to schedule a pre-renewal strategy meeting is step one in protecting the organization’s mission and future. The five items above should facilitate healthy discussion and help to answer questions and concerns.

For more information about your renewal process, please contact me  at (619) 937-0175 or sbrown@ranchomesa.com.

Protecting the Organization and Employees When Offering Retirement Plans

Author, Sam Brown, Vice President, Human Services Group, Rancho Mesa Insurance Services, Inc.

In this competitive labor market, employers may offer ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) compliant retirement plans to draw and retain a talented workforce. It makes sense; data shows that retirement benefits reduce turnover, build employee trust, and offer predictable retirement savings.

Exposure to Liability

While an ERISA plan offers many benefits to an organization, savvy leaders understand U.S. labor code exposes employers to significant liabilities. This liability is due to the strict fiduciary duties the law requires of plan sponsors and fiduciaries. Under ERISA, a plan fiduciary is any person:

1. Exercising discretionary control or authority over plan management or administration,

2. Exercising any authority or control over the management or disposition of plan assets,

3. Rendering investment advice for a fee or other compensation.

According to the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL), within a leadership framework, fiduciaries may include plan trustees, plan administrators, members of an investment committee, investment managers, and corporate officers with plan oversight.

In addition, fiduciaries who do not follow established principles of conduct may be personally liable to restore any losses to the plan following a breach of fiduciary duty.

A complaint of a breach of fiduciary duty may allege imprudent investment choices, excessive fees, lack of investment diversity, poorly selected service providers, or failure to follow plan documents.

Addressing Exposures

Critical to the ERISA plan discussion is securing insurance to protect the organization, plan assets, and individual fiduciaries in the event of a claim or lawsuit from plan participants. An employer can accomplish this with two lines of insurance coverage.

To protect the ERISA plan’s assets and employee investments, crime insurance policies typically offer ERISA fidelity coverage. This will pay the insured for direct loss of money and securities belonging to an employee benefit plan caused by theft or forgery committed by a fiduciary. Minimum required limits are generally 10% of the plan assets with a $500,000 maximum. Limits can exceed $500,000 with underwriting approval. Additional information on ERISA bonds can be found on the DOL website.  

To protect the organization and individual fiduciaries against actual or alleged breach of responsibilities, employers would be wise to secure fiduciary liability insurance coverage. In the event of a claim, lawsuit, or government investigation the policy will pay on behalf of the insured all costs of defense and damages up to the limit of liability. It is important to remember the policy will not protect against intentional wrongdoing and does not cover claims against outside service providers.

As employers strive to attract and retain talent, ERISA plans may give organizational leadership a competitive edge in a tight labor market. In doing so, employers should understand and address exposures to liability. An experienced insurance professional will offer guidance and education when seeking the proper protections.

Please contact me at sbrown@ranchomesa.com to discuss these and other risk transfer solutions.

Ensure Pricing Accuracy and Validity of Insurance Coverage

Author, Sam Brown, Vice President, Human Services Group, Rancho Mesa Insurance Services, Inc.

As the insurance market for nonprofit and human service agencies continues to harden, with fewer and fewer insurance companies willing to insure valuable community programs, careful completion and review of the insurance applications will ensure proper pricing and coverage following an insurance claim.

Failure to ensure an application’s accuracy can lead to voided coverage, insufficient coverage, or overpaying of insurance premiums.

A best practice approach is to avoid all of the above by reviewing areas of concern that commonly lead to underwriter confusion and mistakes on insurance policies.

Statement of Values

Carefully review the broker’s Statement of Values (SOV), which lists each location and its underwriting characteristics. Each characteristic aids the underwriter in pricing and rating for the exposure to risk. The SOV will include:

• Location usage - is the location used for office space, a resale shop, a residential recovery center, or all three?

• Square footage - this is easy to overlook, but impacts property and general liability insurance premium.

• Building construction – what is the building date, construction type, and safeguards like non-sprinklered wood frame or sprinklered steel/concrete construction? Inquiring underwriters (and their supervisors) want to know.

• Are all non-owned locations listed? Leased space is often omitted. List the addresses of all operations to ensure coverage.

Vehicle Values

Is the list of vehicles accurate and does the replacement cost of each vehicle include modifications such as wheelchair lifts? Non-standard vehicles are often underinsured if the agent assumes it is just a standard Dodge Caravan without modifications.

Complete the Full Insurance Application

Renewal applications often do not contain space to update existing program details. So, share the details of new programs or ask about recent incidents that could result in a claim. Worse yet, a competing underwriter may offer a quote without firm and bindable terms, meaning the work product is incomplete and does not consider all exposures.

List Employed and Contracted Professionals

Professional liability is often rated on the number of employed professionals. A review of this section will ensure pricing accuracy and highlight professions requiring separate coverage, such as medical malpractice insurance.

Business Interruption Worksheet

Rancho Mesa clients understand the importance of business interruption coverage, so a thorough review of the worksheet’s definitions, the information contained therein, and hypothetical claim scenarios will help leadership make informed decisions. Without the proper limit, a seemingly insignificant property claim can result in critical lost revenue and extra expense. 

Right-sized Deductibles

Why pay for a smaller deductible if the organization only reports claims of financial significance? To ensure insurance premiums match leadership’s risk tolerance, the policyholder and broker should carefully review auto, property, and liability deductibles. Organizations accepting risk in the form of a higher deductible will realize premium savings.

In 2025’s hardening market, insurance underwriters need accurate and updated information to provide competitive and comprehensive quotes. Fortunately, it is easy to avoid a potentially uninsured claim or inaccurate insurance premium with a well planned and executed pre-renewal insurance review with an experienced insurance broker. Use these items detailed above to ensure the organization, its mission, and their employees are protected.

To ensure your nonprofit or human service agency has accurate coverage, contact me at (619) 937-175 sbrown@ranchomesa.com.

A Hardening Insurance Market for Non-Profits-Steps to Prepare for the 2025 Renewal Process

Author, Sam Brown, Vice President, Human Services Group, Rancho Mesa Insurance Services, Inc.

Non-profit and human services leaders started experiencing a hardening property and casualty insurance market in 2024 illustrated by reduced limits of liability, higher deductibles, and increased premiums. And, the market shift still may not have been enough to right the ship.

According to Insurancebusinessmag.com, reinsurers are seeking double digit increases in 2025 due to rising claim costs. Behind these rising claims costs are social inflation, emerging risks (i.e., opioid and synthetic chemicals), reserve increases, litigation funding and no promising tort reform. Reinsurers also argue that 2024 rate hikes were insufficient. As a result, these companies are reducing exposure to the US casualty market.

When reinsurers sneeze, the insurance market and its insurers catch a cold. In 2025, expect more signs of the hardening market. However, there are steps non-profit leaders can do to prepare for the renewal process in 2025.

Anticipate Premium Increases

Consider the organization’s growth in all rating factors, whether it be revenue, employee count, vehicles, or beds. Premium will increase accordingly before rate increases.

Complete Full Insurance Applications

An experienced insurance agent will ask clients to update applications in hard copy, using electronic documents, or via an online portal. If this is not happening, ask why. If it is happening, then complete the full version rather than truncated renewal applications. Creating competition in the marketplace means providing underwriters a full scope and understanding of operations. Very few underwriters will quote using another carrier’s renewal updates.

Review Contract Insurance Requirements

Many carriers are reducing limits of liability for abuse/molestation and professional liability. Others will no longer quote umbrella or excess liability. Stacking quotes from various carriers to achieve once readily attainable limits is possible, but this strategy comes with a significant premium cost. So, before stacking policies, review contracts with counties, regional centers, and funders to understand the required insurance coverage.

Engage with Partners Now

Communicate to organization partners the cost to maintain required insurance limits. Take a hard look at current programs to determine if outcomes (i.e., revenue and impact) warrant the increased insurance costs. Some programs may need to sunset.

A continuing hardening insurance market in 2025 will force non-profit and human services leaders to approach the renewal process with care and new focus. The recommended steps listed above will help organization leaders develop a renewal strategy while helping underwriters’ analysis prior to releasing quotes.

For more information about the hardening market, contact me at sbrown@ranchomesa.com or (619) 937-0175.

Protecting Non-Profit Operations with Business Interruption Insurance

Author, Sam Brown, Vice President, Human Services Group, Rancho Mesa Insurance Services, Inc.

A non-profit organization’s culture and positive impact often flows through its strategically placed locations in the communities it serves. These locations, whether they be offices, group homes, childcare centers, or shelters all further the mission and may drive revenue. The cost to the organization if one of these locations becomes inoperable due to a property damage claim can often add undue stress to the finances and leadership. This article will address how business interruption insurance (BII) can address these costs.

Following a covered property loss, a business or non-profit organization may suspend a location’s operations while repairs are made. This is known as the period of restoration. If such a suspension occurs, operations may be impacted in several ways.

 First, revenues may decline. Examples include a health clinic treating a reduced number of patients, a Boys & Girls Club losing members and monthly dues, or donations decrease.

Second, at the risk of losing staff, the organization may need to keep key employees on the payroll who cannot work their shifts during the repairs.

Third, the organization may continue to incur fixed costs at the location such as mortgage, rent, insurance, taxes, professional services and utilities.

Lastly, the non-profit may incur extra expenses to maintain operations or services at an alternative location. These extra expenses may include the cost of an extended stay hotel for clients or increased rent for an alternative worksite, and the cost of moving expenses.

The Challenge

How does a non-profit leader arrive at the most appropriate limit of insurance to indemnify the organization during a loss?

A Best Practice approach would involve the, use of a business interruption worksheet. This document will guide a policyholder and its insurance broker by asking for different line items to be insured.

These items will include:

• Annual net income

• Annual compensation for key people to be retained during the suspension of operations

• Annual employee benefits, pension costs and payroll taxes for key people

• Continuing fixed expenses

• Extra expense

The sum of these figures will provide the limit needed for a 12-month period of restoration. If 12 months does not seem long enough, then the policyholder and broker should discuss a realistic length of time operations would be suspended following severe property damage.

If operations may not resume in full capacity following completion of the repairs, then the policyholder and insurance broker should consider an extended period of restoration.  This may allow a business 180 to 365 days of extended coverage once the period of restoration ends.

Business interruption insurance coverage continues to confuse employers and many insurance brokers who do not have experience working with non-profit organizations. Rancho Mesa encourages decision makers to discuss this coverage and possible disaster plans at length with their insurance broker. It may help avoid a costly financial loss following property damage.

For more information or to ask questions about business interruption coverage, please contact me at sbrown@ranchomesa.com or (619) 937-0175.